Evaluation

**Evaluation**


 * Presentation / 5 points **

1 - 2 points


 * // lacked clarity and detail //
 * // provided no reasons for their decision //
 * // presentation did not engage the audience //

3 points


 * // provided one side of the issue //
 * // presented some evidence in an organised way //

4 - 5 points


 * // presentation was clear and organised //
 * // different perspectives were outlined //
 * // both facts and opinions were provided //
 * // presentation was creative & dynamic //


 * Teamwork / 5 points **

1 - 2 points


 * // unequal participation //
 * // lacked direction //
 * // disconnected //

3 points


 * // activities were completed as a team //
 * // some members did more work than others //

4 - 5 points


 * // each member evenly contributed to all activities //
 * // group members have taken responsibility for their roles //
 * // members actively helped each other when necessary //


 * Journal Content / 10 Points **

1 - 4 points


 * // did not complete all activities within the process stage //
 * // tasks were rushed though //
 * // journal was not organised //

5 - 7 points


 * // tasks were completed, but displayed limited effort //
 * // journal was somewhat organised //

8 - 10 points


 * // completed all activities //
 * // submitted work was of a high standard //
 * // took time to produce creative and detailed work //
 * // organised journal in a neat and structured way //




 * Research and thoroughness / 5 points **

1 - 2 points


 * // journal and presentation showed lack of research //
 * // information from research was inaccurate //

3 points


 * // the journal and presentation display some amount of research //
 * // demonstrates some understanding of the issue //

4 - 5 points


 * // very well researched //
 * // research is clearly shown throughout the journal and presentation //
 * // demonstrates a clear understanding of the planning, the journey and the perspectives regarding the issue //